Post-spring SP+ rankings for all 133 groups, plus the Colorado

• Costs Connelly, ESPN Staff WriterMay 18, 2023, 08:00 AM ET

  Close

  Costs Connelly is a personnel writer for ESPN.com.The transfer portal

is slowing down, media days are around the corner and with all due regard to Week 0– I like it a lot, just as much as all the other weeks– we’re officially 100 days from Sept. 2, the very first real Saturday of the 2023 college football season.It looks like a pretty good time, then, to get up to date on the numbers. Given that February’s initial 2023 SP+ release, we have actually seen a variety of transfers and huge relocations, and I’ve been able to better upgrade returning production figures to represent groups’official lineup releases.(Few had actually released full lineups in early February.)We haven’t seen much motion at the really leading of the rankings, but there’s plenty to talk about.A quick suggestion: Preseason projections are based upon three elements.1. Returning production. The returning production numbers are

based on rosters I have actually upgraded as much as possible to account

for transfers and attrition. The combination of in 2015’s SP+ratings and adjustments based upon returning production comprises majority the projections formula.2. Recent recruiting. This piece notifies us of the caliber of a group’s prospective replacements(and/or brand-new stars) in the lineup.

It is identified by the past couple of years of recruiting rankings in diminishing order (indicating the most recent class brings one of the most weight). This is also impacted by the recruiting rankings of incoming transfers, an acknowledgment that the art of roster management is now greatly determined by the transfer website. This piece makes up about one-third of the forecasts formula.3. Current history. Utilizing a sliver of info from previous seasons(2 to 4 years ago)offers us a good procedure of general program health. It stands to reason that a group that has played well for one year is less likely to replicate that effort than a group that has been good for years on end( and vice versa ), right?(One other pointer: SP +is a pace-and opponent-adjusted measure of college football effectiveness. It is a predictive procedure of the most sustainable and foreseeable elements of football, not a résumé ranking, and along those very same lines, these forecasts aren’t intended to be a guess at what the AP Top 25 will appear like at the end of the year. These are merely early offseason power rankings based on the info we have actually had the ability to collect to date. )Here are the full, updated rankings: