SEC is having ‘significant’ talks on field storming

IRVING, Texas– SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said on Tuesday the conference is having “meaningful discussions” about changing its longstanding policy on field storming to deal with security issues, and a vast array of options are being considered by a working group.SI.com on Monday reported the SEC was mulling the concept that if fans stormed the field, their group might surrender home field benefit the next time they deal with that opponent. When asked if surrendering a future house game was discussed, Sankey stated it was”recognized”as a continuum of ideas that also consisted of altering the fines.” We can take the fines away, we can leave fines the

way they are, “he stated, talking to a little group of reporters following the first day of College Football Playoff spring conferences.”We can double fines, we can triple fines. We can quadruple fines. We can set higher standards for checking out teams and officials’ protections. You could set some standards where the group exits. There’s a whole continuum.Editor’s Picks 2 Related “Our group is still working.

Have they spoke about things? Yeah

. Did they speak about flipping home games? Absolutely. Does that suggest it’s going to happen? That’s why the membership gets to vote.”The working group has actually not yet assembled a proposition on the concern. Sankey said it’s possible it could be identified at May spring conferences in Destin, Florida, or it could take place at any point between now and the start of the season.” Ultimately we’ll decide,”he said.

“We can’t have unhealthy environments. “The SEC has had a policy on field or

court storming in location considering that 2004. The SEC presently fines a school$50,000 for a very first offense, then increases it to $100,000 for a 2nd offense and$250,000 for each one after that. The fine money is transferred into the SEC Post-Graduate Scholarship Fund.”I would argue that part of what needs to happen is we need to alter the culture,

“Sankey stated.”… I do not believe simply passing a guideline can stop it. People need to stop it.”