College professional athlete work costs progresses

• Dan Murphy, ESPN Staff WriterJun 13, 2024, 06:10 PM ET

  Close

  • Covers the Huge 10
  • Joined ESPN.com in 2014
  • Graduate of the University of Notre Dame

A Congressional committee voted Thursday to move on with a bill that would prevent college athletes from being deemed staff members of their schools, conferences or the NCAA.The vote in the

U.S. Home Committee on Education and the Workforce represents the first tangible signs of progress the college sports industry has actually made in its years-long push for a federal law to assist reshape college sports. It comes simply weeks after the NCAA and its power conferences announced they have actually consented to share considerably more earnings with athletes as part of an antitrust suit settlement.The expense, introduced by Rep. Bob Good(R-Virginia)on the very same day the

antitrust settlement was announced, remains in the early phases of the legal procedure. It is most likely to face opposition from Democrats in the Senate as well as legal obstacles if it’s passed.The NCAA is currently an accused in several continuous lawsuit that argue

college athletes ought to be approved the rights of staff members. One case in federal court– Johnson v. NCAA– is seeking base pay and other office security for college professional athletes. Two other active cases in front of the National Labor Relations Board are looking for to provide college athletes the right to form unions and jointly bargain.NCAA president Charlie Baker said earlier today that he hoped the recent antitrust settlement, if it’s authorized

by a judge, would provide the framework for a college sports model that allows schools to compensate their athletes without turning them into workers. Baker stated he does not think most college professional athletes wish to be thought about employees.Editor’s Picks 2 Related”A lot of the discussions I’ve had with people in Congress is:’The reason we have an interest in work is because of the payment concern, ‘”Baker stated previously this

week.” If the court blesses [the antitrust settlement], then it puts us in a position where we can go to Congress and say one of the 3 branches of the federal government blessed this as a design to develop payment without activating work. “The NCAA and power conferences have lobbied Congress for laws that would restrict their legal liability and avoid athletes from being employees for the previous numerous years. College sports leaders say these laws are

required to protect many teams and athletic departments that can not manage to pay their professional athletes like workers. Both the NCAA and power conferences have publicly mentioned their assistance for Good’s bill.The costs is planned to be a narrow part of a broader package of federal legislation that ensures more benefits for professional athletes in the future while avoiding them from being workers. Nevertheless, no partner costs that would ensure professional athlete benefits have actually been presented yet.The Labor force and Education Committee voted 23-16 to move forward with the expense. All 23 votes in favor originated from Republicans. All 16 votes versus came from Democrats. The argument over whether Congress ought to weigh in on the college sports organization model has actually been a partisan debate for the previous several years.Democrats in your house and Senate have previously co-sponsored bills that would have the precise opposite result of Good’s expense– codifying college professional athletes’right to unionize. Those lawmakers and other supporters say athletes need the capability to deal jointly to ensure they can work out for products such as improved treatment and a reasonable share of the money they generate for a multibillion-dollar industry.Rep. Lori Trahan(D-Mass. )– a previous college volley ball player who has been an active individual in the Capitol Hill debate on the future of college sports– said she will vote versus Good’s expense if it reaches the House flooring.”When once again, Republicans in Congress have decided to plow forward with legislation to restrict the rights of college professional athletes with little to no input from professional athletes

themselves,”Trahan stated in a statement after Thursday’s vote.If passed, Good’s expense would stop the ongoing efforts of the NLRB and in the Johnson v. NCAA case to make professional athletes into workers. Paul McDonald, lead lawyer for the plaintiffs

in the Johnson case, stated he believes the bill as written would breach federal equal defense laws. McDonald said it’s against the law to prevent some college students from being staff members while others in that classification– like snack bar employees or mentor assistants– are allowed to make wages and unionize. “If enacted, [the costs] would never make it through judicial difficulty. To wit, it is a wild-goose chase, “McDonald said in a statement supplied to ESPN after Thursday’s vote. “Dilatory strategies have effects. The only thing accomplished by the NCAA in needlessly dragging out the recognition of college professional athletes as per hour employees like their fellow trainees is to significantly increase the

cost of resolution borne by its membership. “In a news release provided prior to Thursday’s vote, Good said his bill was focused on making sure the custom of college sports wasn’t”messed up by reclassifying student professional athletes as staff members. “”My legislation will help preserve a balance between athletics and academics, ensuring that college sports programs remain feasible, useful, and enjoyable for all student professional athletes,”he said.